Εξειδίκευση τύπου :	Κεφάλαιο σε πρακτικά συνεδρίου
Τίτλος:	Η ιδέα του έθνους και της εθνικής κοινότητας στην ελληνική ιστοριογραφία
Εναλλακτικός τίτλος:	The idea of the nation and national community in greek historiography
Δημιουργός/Συγγραφέας:	[EL] Κιτρομηλίδης, Πασχάλης[EN] Kitromilides, Paschalis
Διοργανωτής συνάντησης:	[EL] Τομέας Νεοελληνικών Ερευνών[EN] Section of Neohellenic Research
Επιμελητής έκδοσης:	[EL] Κιτρομηλίδης, Πασχάλης[EN] Kitromilides, Paschalis [EL] Σκλαβενίτης, Τριαντάφυλλος[EN] Sklavenitis, Triantafyllos
Εκδότης:	[EL] Εθνικό Ίδρυμα Ερευνών. Κέντρο Νεοελληνικών Ερευνών[EN] National Hellenic Research Foundation. Center for Neohellenic Research
Τόπος έκδοσης:	Αθήνα Athens
Ημερομηνία:	2004
Γλώσσα:	Ελληνικά Αγγλικά
ISBN:	960-7916-39-5 (σετ) 960-7916-37-9 (τ.1)
Περίληψη:	The idea ofthe Greek nation as a diachronic historical agent, marked by unity and continuity through the millennia, constitutes the fundamental logical premise of Greek historiography. Early quests for a definition of a distinct modern Greek national community, primarily characterized by the lineage that connected it with ancient Hellas, were noticeable in the historical thought of the Greek Enlightenment and its epigones. The decisive contribution to the crystallization of the idea of the Greek nation as it has been known to the present day came in the historical writings ofConstantinos Paparrigopoulos, primarily in his monumental History ofthe Greek nation (first ed. 1860-1874, second definitive ed. 1885-1887). The work was the crowning intellectual achievement of Greek romanticism and presupposed important developments in Greek historical and philosophical thought since the advent of Greece to independent statehood in 1830. Paparrigopoulos’ History put its mark on Greek historical consciousness, especially by placing the study of the Medieval millennium of Greek history at the main focus ofhistoriographical attention. His imposing accomplishment functioned as a model for other Balkan historians, most notably V. Zlatarski and N. Iorga, in developing the historiographical canon of their own nations. The extent of Paparrigopoulos’ achievement is characteristically suggested by the total eclipse it brought about of an earlier tradition of historical writing, treating the Greeks as part of a broader Orthodox community, held together by the Church and its values. Even ecclesiastical historians abandonned this historiographical approach and conformed to the new normative framework of historical writing connected with Paparrigopoulos’ work. This normative historiographical framework has remained unquestioned in defining the historiographical canon and in setting the priorities of both academic and popular historiography. It has been equally decisive as an overall framework for leftist historiography, which espoused the Marxist predilection for economic and social history but did not dissent from the normative idea of national community defined by Paparrigopoulos. Progress in historical research and new approaches to historical writing in the latter part of the twentieth century have remained loyal to the normative and interpretative premises ofthe Paparrigopoulean legacy, by not putting to question its fundamental premise, the idea of unity and continuity of the Greek nation through the ages. Alternative approaches, nevertheless, have emerged indirectly from 1974 onward in the works of literary and social historians, who focused on the dynamic ideological and social processes which produced a distinctly modern Greek national community in the nineteenth century, thus pointing to possibilities of emancipating Greek historical thinking from the romantic teleological framework. Such approaches include the examination of the gradual construction by the new Greek state of an “ideological infrastructure”, upon which the conception of the Greek nation was elaborated (C. Th. Dimaras); the consideration through the prism oftheories of dependence and reproduction of the emergence of a dynamic Greek nation, comprising the population of the Greek kingdom but also a wide-ranging diaspora beyond the Greek borders in the nineteenth century (C. Tsoukalas); and finally the appraisal of the decisive weight ofsocial banditry in nation-building in the same period (J. Koliopoulos). These newer approaches opened the way for a critical study of the phenomena of Greek nationalism and encouraged the emergence of a new historical literature, that attempts to connect the study of the Greek historical experience with contemporary theories and debates on the subject of nations and nationalism in international scholarship.
Όνομα εκδήλωσης:	Ιστοριογραφία της νεότερης και σύγχρονης Ελλάδας 1833-2002 Historiography of modern and contemporary Greece 1833-2002
Ημ/νία έναρξης εκδήλωσης :	2002-10-29
Ημ/νία λήξης εκδήλωσης :	2002-11-03
Τόπος εκδήλωσης:	Αθήνα Athens
Τίτλος πηγής δημοσίευσης:	Ιστοριογραφία της νεότερης και σύγχρονης Ελλάδας 1833-2002: Δ' διεθνές συνέδριο ιστορίας: Πρακτικά: Τόμος Α' Historiography of modern and contemporary Greece, 1833-2002: IV international congress of history: Proceedings: Volume I
Σελίδες:	37-52
Θεματική Κατηγορία:	[EL] Ιστορία[EN] History [EL] Γεωγραφία, Ανθρωπολογία, Αναψυχή[EN] Geography, Anthropology, Recreation
Κάτοχος πνευματικών δικαιωμάτων:	Copyright © Εθνικό Ίδρυμα Ερευνών (ΕΙΕ) / Κέντρο Νεοελληνικών Ερευνών (ΚΝΕ)
Είναι μέρος του:	Ιστοριογραφία της νεότερης και σύγχρονης Ελλάδας 1833-2002: Δ' διεθνές συνέδριο ιστορίας: Πρακτικά: Τόμος Α'
Εμφανίζεται στις συλλογές:	Τομέας Νεοελληνικών Ερευνών - Επιστημονικό έργο